이 글은 일반적인 법률 정보 제공을 목적으로 작성되었습니다. 개별 사건에 대한 법률 조언이 아니며, 구체적인 법적 사안은 자격을 갖춘 법률 전문가와 상담하시기 바랍니다.
Use this checklist to assess your wrongful termination or unfair dismissal claim and understand your next steps under U.S. employment law.
If you've recently lost your job and believe the termination was unlawful, this wrongful termination unfair dismissal checklist will help you organize your situation, preserve critical evidence, and understand whether you may have a valid legal claim. Use it as soon as possible after your dismissal—timing matters.
Work through each item methodically. Check off what applies to your situation and note any gaps in documentation. This checklist does not determine your legal outcome, but it helps you arrive at a consultation with a lawyer fully prepared.
Wrongful termination typically refers to a firing that violates a law, contract, or public policy. "Unfair dismissal" is a concept more common in other countries, but in the U.S. context it often describes terminations that feel unjust even if technically legal under at-will employment rules.
Yes. Even at-will employees have legal protections against termination based on discrimination, retaliation, or violations of public policy.
Deadlines vary by claim type and state. Federal EEOC claims generally require filing within 180–300 days. State law claims may have different windows—acting quickly is essential.
No, but legal guidance is strongly recommended. An attorney can help you frame your claim correctly and avoid procedural errors that could affect your case.
Use ROY's free AI analysis to understand how the law applies to your specific situation.
This article provides general legal information only and does not constitute legal advice for your specific situation. Laws vary by state/territory. Consult a qualified lawyer for advice tailored to your circumstances.
팩트에 기반한 판례·사례입니다. '원문 보기'를 클릭하면 국가법령정보센터 등 공식 출처로 이동합니다.
McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Green — discrimination burden-shifting
Framework for proving employment discrimination
The Supreme Court set out the burden-shifting framework: the plaintiff establishes a prima facie case, the employer offers a legitimate reason, and the plaintiff may then show pretext.
※ Leading U.S. precedent — reference only
Burlington Industries, Inc. v. Ellerth — supervisor harassment liability
Employer liability for a hostile work environment created by a supervisor
The Supreme Court held employers may be liable for a supervisor-created hostile work environment, subject to an affirmative defense where no tangible employment action occurred.
※ Leading U.S. precedent — reference only
팩트에 기반한 판례·사례입니다. '원문 보기'를 클릭하면 국가법령정보센터 등 공식 출처로 이동합니다.
* 위 수치는 ROY AI의 유사 사건 분석 기반 추정치입니다. 개별 사건의 결과와 다를 수 있으며, 법률적 조언이나 결과 보장이 아닙니다.
지금 상황을 입력하면 AI가 쟁점을 정리하고, 유사 사례 기반 결과 분포와 전문 로펌 연결까지 한 번에 제공합니다.
이 문서는 일반적인 법률 정보 제공 목적으로 작성되었으며, 개별 사건에 대한 법률 자문, 법적 조언, 또는 결과 보장이 아닙니다. 구체적인 법적 사안에 대해서는 반드시 자격을 갖춘 법률 전문가와 상담하시기 바랍니다. ROY Legal Insights는 정보 제공 서비스이며, 법무법인이 아닙니다. 최초 발행일: 2026.07.04.