이 글은 일반적인 법률 정보 제공을 목적으로 작성되었습니다. 개별 사건에 대한 법률 조언이 아니며, 구체적인 법적 사안은 자격을 갖춘 법률 전문가와 상담하시기 바랍니다.

Understand what constitutes a breach of contract in Australia, the types of breaches, and the legal remedies available to you when an agreement is broken.
A breach of contract occurs when one party to a legally binding agreement fails to fulfil their obligations under that agreement without a lawful excuse. In Australia, contract law is largely governed by common law principles, supplemented by legislation such as the Australian Consumer Law (Schedule 2 of the Competition and Consumer Act 2010 (Cth)) and various state-based Sale of Goods Acts.
For a breach of contract claim to succeed, you generally need to establish that:
Not all breaches are equal. Australian courts recognise several categories:
When a breach of contract occurs, Australian law provides several remedies depending on the circumstances:
Importantly, the innocent party has a duty to mitigate their loss. This means you must take reasonable steps to reduce the impact of the breach — you cannot simply allow your losses to accumulate and then claim the full amount.
Strict limitation periods apply to breach of contract claims. In most Australian states and territories, you generally have six years from the date of the breach to commence proceedings, though this can vary. Always seek advice promptly.
A: Not necessarily. Termination is generally only available for a material or repudiatory breach, or where the contract terms specifically allow it. A minor breach may only entitle you to damages.
A: No. Verbal contracts are generally enforceable in Australia, though they can be harder to prove. Some contracts — such as those involving land — must be in writing.
A: Courts may apportion liability or reduce damages where the innocent party also bears some responsibility, depending on the circumstances.
A: Costs vary significantly depending on complexity. Many disputes are resolved through negotiation or mediation before reaching court. Consulting a solicitor early can help you assess your options and costs.
This article provides general legal information only and does not constitute legal advice. Laws may vary between Australian states and territories. Please consult a qualified Australian solicitor for advice specific to your matter.
ROY offers free AI-powered matter analysis — upload your contract details to get an instant overview of your situation.
The most common remedy. The aim is to put the innocent party in the position they would have been in had the contract been performed. Types include:
A court order requiring the breaching party to carry out their contractual obligations. Courts typically grant this where damages would be an inadequate remedy, such as in contracts involving unique property.
A court order restraining a party from doing something that would constitute a breach, or requiring them to stop a continuing breach.
Setting aside the contract so both parties are restored to their pre-contract positions. This is available in cases of serious breach, misrepresentation, or mistake.
Where one party has been unjustly enriched at the other's expense, a court may order repayment.
* 위 수치는 ROY AI의 유사 사건 분석 기반 추정치입니다. 개별 사건의 결과와 다를 수 있으며, 법률적 조언이나 결과 보장이 아닙니다.
지금 상황을 입력하면 AI가 쟁점을 정리하고, 유사 사례 기반 결과 분포와 전문 로펌 연결까지 한 번에 제공합니다.
이 문서는 일반적인 법률 정보 제공 목적으로 작성되었으며, 개별 사건에 대한 법률 자문, 법적 조언, 또는 결과 보장이 아닙니다. 구체적인 법적 사안에 대해서는 반드시 자격을 갖춘 법률 전문가와 상담하시기 바랍니다. ROY Legal Insights는 정보 제공 서비스이며, 법무법인이 아닙니다. 최초 발행일: 2026.08.11.