View Contents+

A redundancy in Australia is only 'genuine' if the job itself is no longer needed and redeployment was not practicable. Employees have 21 days from dismissal to lodge an unfair dismissal claim with the Fair Work Commission if they believe their redundancy was used as a pretext. Understanding both your minimum payout entitlements and the procedural consultation requirements is essential to assessing whether you have grounds to challenge.
- 1.Genuine redundancy requires the job to truly no longer exist and redeployment to be impracticable.
- 2.Lodge any unfair dismissal application within 21 days — this deadline is strictly enforced.
- 3.Consult your pay slip, contract and applicable award to verify your redundancy payout was correctly calculated.
§1Contesting an Unfair Redundancy in Australia: Know Your Rights
§2The Situation: When a "Restructure" Feels Personal
Priya has worked as a marketing coordinator for a mid-sized retail company in Melbourne for six years. In January, her manager tells her the role is being made redundant due to restructuring — but two weeks later she notices the company has advertised an almost identical position titled "Digital Marketing Specialist." Her employer never consulted her during the restructuring process, and she suspects the redundancy was used to push her out rather than eliminate a genuine business need. She received a redundancy payout but is unsure whether it was calculated correctly or whether she can challenge the dismissal altogether.
Situations like Priya's are more common than many employees realise. This guide focuses on the specific question of how you determine whether your redundancy was legally genuine, what your unfair redundancy payout rights actually are, and what concrete steps you can take to push back.
§3What Makes a Redundancy "Genuine" — and What Doesn't
Under the Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth), a redundancy is only genuine if three conditions are all met:
- 1.The employer no longer required the work to be done by anyone. The job must be truly eliminated — not just the person. If your tasks are redistributed to existing staff or a substantially similar role is advertised, this criterion may not be satisfied.
- 1.The employer complied with any obligation to consult. Many modern awards and enterprise agreements require employers to genuinely consult affected employees before finalising a decision to make roles redundant. Consultation must be meaningful — not a formality after the decision has already been made.
- 1.Redeployment was not reasonably practicable. The employer must have considered whether you could be redeployed into a suitable vacancy within the business or an associated entity. If a suitable role existed and was not offered, the genuine redundancy defence may fall away.
If any one of these three elements is absent, your employer cannot rely on the genuine redundancy exclusion to block an unfair dismissal claim. That is the central mechanism most employees overlook.
§4Key distinction: redundancy vs retrenchment vs sham redundancy
| Term | What it means | Legal consequence |
|---|---|---|
| Genuine redundancy | Job no longer needed; consultation met; no redeployment available | Bars an unfair dismissal application |
| Retrenchment | Operational reduction; may or may not be genuine | Depends on the three-part test above |
| Sham redundancy | Role eliminated on paper but work continues under a different title or person | May constitute unfair dismissal |
| Adverse action disguised as redundancy | Termination connected to exercise of a workplace right (e.g., taking leave, raising a complaint) | Separate general protections claim available |
§5Your Redundancy Payout Rights: What You Are Owed
Even in a genuine redundancy, you are entitled to minimum payments under the National Employment Standards (NES). These apply to most permanent (full-time and part-time) employees covered by the national workplace system.
§6Redundancy pay scale under the NES (minimum):
| Years of continuous service | Redundancy pay (weeks of base pay) |
|---|---|
| At least 1 year but less than 2 | 4 weeks |
| At least 2 years but less than 3 | 6 weeks |
| At least 3 years but less than 4 | 7 weeks |
| At least 4 years but less than 5 | 8 weeks |
| At least 5 years but less than 6 | 10 weeks |
| At least 6 years but less than 7 | 11 weeks |
| At least 7 years but less than 8 | 13 weeks |
| At least 8 years but less than 9 | 14 weeks |
| At least 9 years but less than 10 | 16 weeks |
| 10 years or more | 12 weeks |
Note that the figure drops at 10 years because long-service leave entitlements (which accrue separately) are taken into account under the NES framework.
Your redundancy pay is calculated on your base rate of pay — not ordinary time earnings, loadings or allowances, unless your contract, enterprise agreement or modern award says otherwise. Always check those instruments, because they may be more generous than the NES minimums.
Small business exception: If your employer has fewer than 15 employees (counted at the time of dismissal), no redundancy pay is required under the NES — though a contract may still provide for it.
Casual employees are generally not entitled to NES redundancy pay. However, they retain rights under general protections provisions and, in some circumstances, may argue regular and systematic engagement gives rise to other entitlements.
§7Step-by-Step: How to Challenge a Sham Redundancy
Step 1 — Gather your evidence immediately
Collect your termination letter, employment contract, any applicable enterprise agreement or modern award, payslips, and any written communication about the redundancy or restructure. Screenshot any internal job advertisements for roles similar to yours.
Step 2 — Lodge an unfair dismissal application with the Fair Work Commission
The deadline is 21 calendar days from the date your dismissal takes effect. This is a strict cut-off; late applications require proof of exceptional circumstances and are rarely granted. Lodge online at the Fair Work Commission website (fwc.gov.au) using Form F2.
The filing fee is $82.90 (confirm current amount with the Fair Work Commission, as fees are indexed periodically). Fee waivers are available for genuine financial hardship.
Step 3 — Attend conciliation
Most unfair dismissal matters are referred to a private telephone conciliation within a few weeks of lodgement. A Fair Work Commission conciliator assists both parties to explore settlement. No formal hearing occurs at this stage; parties speak candidly without admissions being used against them later. Around 70–80% of unfair dismissal applications resolve at conciliation.
Step 4 — Proceed to a formal hearing if conciliation fails
If conciliation does not resolve the matter, a Commission Member will conduct a hearing. Both parties may present evidence and submissions. You may represent yourself or engage a solicitor or union representative.
Step 5 — Consider a general protections claim as an alternative or additional avenue
If your redundancy was connected to a workplace right (for example, you recently made a complaint, took parental leave, or engaged in union activity), you may also have a general protections claim under the Fair Work Act 2009. The time limit here is 21 days from dismissal. General protections claims do not require you to have served a minimum employment period, unlike unfair dismissal claims (which generally require 12 months' service with a small business employer or 6 months with any other employer).
Typical duration: Conciliation usually occurs within 4–6 weeks of lodgement. If a hearing is required, resolution can take several months to over a year.
§8Common Mistakes That Undermine a Redundancy Challenge
Missing the 21-day deadline. This is the most frequent and fatal error. Employees often wait to see whether their employer will "do the right thing" or while they seek advice — and the window closes. Lodge first, seek advice concurrently if needed.
Accepting the payout without understanding what it covers. Signing a deed of release in exchange for a redundancy payment may extinguish your right to bring further claims. Read any settlement document carefully before signing, ideally with legal advice.
Assuming the redundancy must be genuine because the employer said so. An employer's characterisation of a termination as a redundancy is not determinative. The Fair Work Commission looks at the substance of what occurred.
Overlooking consultation obligations. Many employees do not know that their award or enterprise agreement requires genuine prior consultation. Failure to raise this in an application is a missed opportunity.
Confusing redundancy pay with notice pay. These are separate entitlements. Even if you received a redundancy payout, you may also be owed payment in lieu of notice, accrued annual leave on termination, and long service leave depending on your jurisdiction and length of service.
Not checking for redeployment opportunities. If a suitable vacancy existed within a related entity at the time of your redundancy and your employer did not genuinely consider placing you in it, this is a basis to contest the genuine redundancy finding. Ask your employer in writing what vacancies were considered.
§9Relevant Law
The primary legislation governing redundancy in Australia is the Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth). It sets out the genuine redundancy definition (which requires absence of the work, compliance with consultation obligations, and consideration of redeployment), the National Employment Standards (which prescribe minimum redundancy pay scales), and the unfair dismissal and general protections frameworks. State and territory public sector employees are generally covered by state legislation rather than the federal scheme — confirm the applicable framework with the relevant agency in your jurisdiction.
Modern awards and enterprise agreements registered under the Fair Work Act 2009 frequently contain additional redundancy and consultation obligations. The Fair Work Regulations 2009 prescribe procedural matters including application forms and fee structures.
§10Real Cases: Issues That Have Arisen
The cases provided as sources for this article concern New South Wales Supreme Court matters in areas of discrimination, contract and corporate law — none of which directly address unfair redundancy payout rights under the Fair Work framework. As a result, no specific case citations are provided in this section.
What Fair Work Commission decisions consistently show (as a matter of general principle, without citing specific case numbers not provided here) is that:
- Employers who re-advertise substantially similar roles shortly after a redundancy face serious scrutiny about whether the work was genuinely no longer required.
- A failure to meet consultation obligations under an enterprise agreement or modern award has been treated as defeating a genuine redundancy defence.
- The Commission examines both whether redeployment was considered and whether it was genuinely practicable — not simply whether it was formally offered or refused.
If you would like to research specific Fair Work Commission decisions, the Commission's publicly searchable database at fwc.gov.au contains thousands of unfair dismissal decisions.
§11Checklist: Before You Act on a Redundancy
- [ ] Received written notice of redundancy and understand the stated reason
- [ ] Identified whether your employer is covered by the national Fair Work system or a state system
- [ ] Checked your length of service to confirm eligibility for unfair dismissal (6 months / 12 months for small business)
- [ ] Reviewed your contract, enterprise agreement and modern award for consultation and severance provisions
- [ ] Verified your redundancy payout calculation against the NES minimum scale
- [ ] Documented any evidence that the role or similar work has continued after your dismissal
- [ ] Noted the date your dismissal takes effect and counted forward 21 days
- [ ] Considered whether any workplace right you exercised preceded the redundancy decision (general protections angle)
- [ ] Sought advice before signing any deed of release or settlement document
- [ ] Lodged Form F2 with the Fair Work Commission before the 21-day deadline (or sought an extension urgently if the deadline has passed)
§12Get a Free Head Start on Your Matter
ROY's free AI matter analysis can help you map out the key issues in your situation before you speak to a solicitor — start there to clarify your position quickly.
Disclaimer: This article provides general legal information about Australian law and is not legal advice. Laws vary by state and territory, and individual circumstances differ. You should consult a qualified Australian solicitor for advice specific to your situation.


Frequently Asked Questions
Q. Can I be made redundant and then see my job re-advertised shortly after?+
If your former employer re-advertises a substantially similar role soon after your redundancy, this is a strong indicator that the redundancy may not have been genuine. Under the Fair Work Act 2009, a genuine redundancy requires that the employer no longer requires anyone to perform the work you were doing. You may have grounds to file an unfair dismissal application with the Fair Work Commission within 21 days of your dismissal taking effect.
Q. What is the difference between redundancy pay and notice pay in Australia?+
Redundancy pay (also called severance pay) is a separate entitlement from notice pay. Notice pay compensates you for the period of notice your employer was required to give before termination, while redundancy pay is calculated based on your continuous length of service under the National Employment Standards. You are generally entitled to both, and your employment contract or enterprise agreement may provide for more than the minimum amounts.
Q. Does the 21-day deadline to lodge a claim apply even if I am still negotiating with my employer?+
Yes. The 21-day period to lodge an unfair dismissal application with the Fair Work Commission runs from the date your dismissal takes effect, regardless of any ongoing negotiations or discussions with your employer. Failing to lodge within this time can result in your application being dismissed unless you can show exceptional circumstances. It is important not to delay while awaiting the outcome of internal negotiations.
Q. Are casual employees entitled to redundancy pay in Australia?+
Generally, casual employees are not entitled to redundancy pay under the National Employment Standards because they do not have a continuous period of employment in the same way permanent employees do. However, if a casual employee has worked on a regular and systematic basis and has a reasonable expectation of continuing employment, they may have other protections — for example, rights against adverse action under the Fair Work Act 2009. Each situation is unique and you should seek specific legal advice.
Q. What happens if my employer failed to consult me before making my role redundant?+
A failure to follow consultation obligations under a modern award or enterprise agreement is a key factor in determining whether a redundancy was genuine. If your employer was required to consult under an applicable instrument and did not do so, this may mean the redundancy does not meet the genuine redundancy definition — leaving the door open for an unfair dismissal claim. Document any absence of consultation, as this evidence can be critical before the Fair Work Commission.
Let ROY organise your case
before you go it alone
Enter your situation and AI will map out the key issues, outcome distribution from similar cases, and connect you to specialist firms — all in one step.
Related Legal Guides
Partner Visa Applications in Australia: Eligibility, Evidence and Timeline
Spousal and De Facto Visa Applications in Australia: A Complete Guide
What to Do After a Workplace Injury: Reporting and Claims Steps
Making a Tribunal Claim in Australia: A Step-by-Step Guide
This document is provided for general informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice, legal counsel, or a guarantee of outcome for any specific case. For specific legal matters, please consult a qualified Australian legal practitioner. ROY Legal Insights is an information service and not a law firm. First published: 2026.11.07.